|
Re: Free security s/w products from Comodo Group:
de Comodo 06/01/2006 01:13
Klaatu wrote:
> On Wed, 31 May 2006 20:22:42 GMT, Comodo posted to alt.comp.freeware:
>
> >
> > Klaatu wrote:
> >> Also, it seems a bit suspicious to me that Comodo, in its attempted
> >> defense of its marketing practices, that it always links to posts on
> >> its forums or other pages on its website, which are hardly unbiased
> >> places to be looking for such information. One would be wise to look
> >> elsewhere to determine the truthfulness of the matter.
> >
> > Klaatu
> >
> > Did you even take a look at the links i sent that was in our forums
> > for god sake!
> > if you did, you would see the third party letters and third party
> > editorials about trusttoolbar.
> >
> > So what is your complaint about?
>
> First of all, you may want to learn to quote in usenet; you posted all
> kinds of useless junk such as my signature and quotes from others having
> nothing to do with what you're responding to.
>
> Second, I did not lodge any complaint, did I? Just an observation about
> your posting practices. You seem a bit defensive; why not let the quality
> (or lack thereof) of your product speak for itself? Do you not want
> others to do as I suggested and look to other sources of information
> besides your obviously biased forums?
>
> Third, I doubt I'll ever even try one of your programs based on the
> attitude you've displayed in this newsgroup. I don't like pushy people,
> and you're about as pushy as they come.
>
> HAND
>
> --
> "Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity. It
> eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the
> business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation."
> - Johnny Hart
Klaatu
I hate to start a war as my intention is simply to set the record
straight. But you blamed us for providing biased information from our
forums:
Thats what you said:
"Also, it seems a bit suspicious to me that Comodo, in its attempted
defense
of its marketing practices, that it always links to posts on its forums
or
other pages on its website, which are hardly unbiased places to be
looking
for such information. One would be wise to look elsewhere to determine
the
truthfulness of the matter."
Even though what is being mentioned in our forums link to third party
information.
So please tell us why did you make the above statement if you knew the
information we provided was third party information from reputable
sources?
thanks
Melih