> On Mon, 29 May 2006 16:15:55 +0200, Boorstelt(c) <info@boorstelt.nl>
> wrote:
>
>>> On 29 May 2006 03:22:07 GMT, "badgolferman"
>>> <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Al Klein, 5/28/2006,10:50:22 PM, wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 28 May 2006 20:41:13 GMT, "badgolferman"
>>>>> <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> As popular as it is to claim President Bush has done illegal
>>>>>> things, it still hasn't been proven in any case directly tied to
>>>>>> him.
>>>>>
>>>>> Desertion is illegal and, aside from the mealy-mouthed PR that says,
>>>>> in effect, "you can't prove a thing", he's guilty of desertion.
>>>>> Commander in Thief, at the very least. (Cashing a government pay
>>>>> check while not being there during the hours for which you're being
>>>>> paid is larceny.)
>>>>
>>>> Desertion from what? Surely you are not referring to the discredited
>>>> CBS report that was proven to be a lie?
>>>
>>> No, I'm referring to the reports whose refutations were proved to be
>>> lies.
>>
>> Je bent een zeurpiet.
>
> Very communicative ... I guess.
Jij niet dan?
For translation click here: http://www.freetranslation.com/
or
http://www.worldlingo.com/en/products_services/worldlingo_translator.html