On 30 May 2006 20:04:52 -0700 'Comodo'
posted this onto alt.comp.freeware:
>hummingbird wrote:
>> On 29 May 2006 18:27:08 -0700 'Comodo'
>> posted this onto alt.comp.freeware:
>>
>> >hummingbird wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 29 May 2006 10:20:26 -0400 'Brian Robertson'
>> >> posted this onto alt.comp.freeware:
>> >>
>> >> >"hummingbird" <OPRBMDQMZNLV@spammotel.com> wrote in message
>> >> >news:35fl72hjhg2njui4dhmufismi72s0iipi7@4ax.com...
>> >> >> NB: I have not installed any of these products myself and therefore
>> >> >> cannot vouch for them
>> >> >
>> >> >So why are you posting this message about their software?
>> >>
>> >> I have no current use for any of these products ...others might.
>> >> I am not here to speak for others.
>> >>
>> >> That should be easy for a socialist to understand.
>> >>
>> >> >BTW there was an earlier thread that discussed the toolbar that is
>> >> >apparently installed with their software, that may be adware.
>> >>
>> >> I have no knowledge of this, hence my previous mild warning that I
>> >> have not installed any of the products. Others should read into that
>> >> what they will and take care.
>> >
>> >
>> >There is no Adaware or anything malicious in any of our products.
>> >pls read our forums on this where we explain why people are misinformed
>> >forums.comodo.com
>> >
>> >thanks
>> >Melih
>>
>> Thanks. According to the spywareguide.com link provided by 'chris'
>> on this newsgroup, your free products do include a malicious toolbar.
>> Another poster has also referenced earlier debate about this problem.
>>
>> Without installing one of your products I have no way to verify this
>> issue but Comodo need to understand that there are some razor sharp
>> folks on this newsgroup who can sniff out dodgy software at 1000
>> metres!!! It looks like Comodo is off the agenda for the moment...
>
>
>Hummingbird
>
>I must respectfully disagre with your statement about the folks who can
>sniff out dodgy software at 1000 metres. Anybody who classifies what we
>have as adware, spyware or malicious, does not know the first thing
>about computers/software and just talking non-sense!
>
>I am open to challange by anyone, instead of reading and
>re-representing mis-information here, prove me wrong by showing that
>any one of our programs is adware, spyware or malicious!
Thanks Melih. Given the debate which has started on a.c.f. about your
products, it seems that there are some people who mis-classify.
But I stand by my earlier comment - there are some well informed folks
on a.c.f. I have found the newsgroup to be a useful resource.
What seems to have happened is that spywareguide have criticised your
products from a vested interest point of view (see Craig's comments)
and this subtlety hasn't been picked up by a few people.
Please bear in mind that it was me who posted details about your free
products originally to inform others, so I have no personal axe to
grind. Based upon recent comments, I would install any one of them if
I had a current use for them.
You might like to post the .pdf file for folks to read...