In article <MrQ97D155E04CBB3itsmeitsQ@QsFQDN.dyndns.org>, boxcars@gmx.net
says...
>
>
>Chris Lee <clee2@envirolink.org> wrote in
><news:Y-ydncHs68ywEOTZnZ2dnUVZ_umdnZ2d@pghconnect.com>:
>
>> In article <MrQ97D090227B1AitsmeitsQ@QsFQDN.dyndns.org>,
>> boxcars@gmx.net says...
>>
>>> The GPL is one of many open source licenses.
>>
>> Wrong. The GPL license has *NOTHING TO DO WITH OPEN SOURCE*
>> licenses.
>
>You might want to e-mail the Open Source Initiative and have them
>"correct" their website, then.
>
><http://opensource.org/licenses/index.php>
>
>--
>»Q«
Why bother? The Open Source Initiative has *NOTHING* to do with
the GPL.
The people responsible for the GPL is the FSF (Free Software Foundation)
whom pretty much has nothing to do with the Open Source Initiative.
If you Windows types want to comment about Free and Open Source Software,
you'ld better had first learn just who and what the players are.