|
Re: looking for sidekick 95 or 97 or even 99
de Lee 05/27/2006 01:38
DS 007 wrote:
> I'd suggest that that is 'operator error' ...... every system I have
> used it on (sidekick95 and 98) for the last 10 years has worked
> flawlessly. But then, you don't use or comment on PAYWARE, do you JC ?
>
Actually, SK was often a problem, even back from its early DOS days. It
was a TSR and would conflict with lots of things. When Win 95 came
along, it didn't handle TSR's much better than DOS so still a lot of
conflicts. Win 98 handled these much better and during the interim, SK
was being better programmed.
Regards
Lee in Toronto
Inviato da X-Privat.Org - Registrazione gratuita http://www.x-privat.org/join.php
| looking for sidekick 95 or 97 or even 99 | *ProteanThread* | |
| Re: looking for sidekick 95 or 97 or even 99 | DS 007 | |
| Re: looking for sidekick 95 or 97 or even 99 | John Corliss | |
| | Re: looking for sidekick 95 or 97 or even 99 | Lee | |
| Re: looking for sidekick 95 or 97 or even 99 | *ProteanThread* | |
| Re: looking for sidekick 95 or 97 or even 99 | John Corliss | |
| Re: looking for sidekick 95 or 97 or even 99 | HVS | |
| Re: looking for sidekick 95 or 97 or even 99 | John Corliss |