Vrodok the Piglet lover <Pay.Troll@70.cents.pls> wrote in
<news:qakt325k9lff7mmhsm753s1na4njc43ra4@4ax.com>:
> Once Upon A Time (on Thu, 13 Apr 2006 17:20:52 -0500), in
> alt.comp.freeware,
> »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net>, by way of Message-id
> <MrQ97A4B078E624DitsmeitsQ@QsFQDN.dyndns.org>, wrote:
>
>> Vrodok the Piglet lover <Pay.Troll@70.cents.pls> wrote in
>> <news:vfht321l3dgpbb6m24djvitsvibrmkvsed@4ax.com>:
>>
>>> Does anyone remember when v1.5.0.1 was "released"? It then came
>>> to light that this so-called release was _not_ a "full", but
>>> rather a beta, of some sort.
>>
>> Yes, but that is not what's happening in this case. Those sites
>> were linking to nightly builds, not releases. The link given in
>> this thread was to the release directory for 1.5.0.2. Stay tuned
>> to <http://www.mozilla.com/> if you want to wait for the official
>> announcement.
>
> Better "safe" than sorry (imho; ymmv).
Sure.
> Or to put this another way, if 1.5.0.2 is available on various &
> sundry sites, why is it not advertised on & at 'Mozilla'?
It's available from mozilla.com, not "various & sundry sites".