Re: Freeware or Freedom of Speech (Choose)

de Klaatu 01/30/2008 09:36

On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 04:48:51 GMT, Ron May posted to alt.comp.freeware:

> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 17:45:05 -0600, "ellis_jay"
> <o'reileus-maleficarum@billsucks.diq> wrote:
>
>> Look up the definition of "force" in the findlaw legal section..then
>> think about the ramifications of that definition as it will be
>> applied in courts. Bad day for Americans who may disagree with folks
>> in power. Then you may want to puke.....

<TINFOIL HAT>

<NUTJOB>

> <SOAPBOX>
> When you have a President of the US assert that he doesn't have to
> obey, let alone defend the Constitution, (or for that matter, the
> Geneva Convention) when it conflicts with his particular views on
> torture, warrantless searches and detention of individuals without
> access to courts at Gitmo and secret CIA detention centers around the
> world, I think it's already too late to fret about the subtleties of
> legislative semantics. Like it or not, the US is a police state
> headed by a "decider" who believes *he* knows best what rights he can
> choose to ignore when it suits his purpose.
> </SOAPBOX>

</NUTJOB>

</TINFOIL HAT>

--
A. Top posters.
Q. What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?