|
Re: Measurement of CPU usage
de PaulFXH 05/06/2006 08:44
Daniel Mandic escreveu:
> PaulFXH wrote:
>
> > Or, are they both right with different interpretations?
> >
> > Paul
>
Daniel
Thanks once again for your comments and the links.
>
> I Don't Know.
>
> I think I saw a Taskmanager for 98SE, in one of these (unofficial)
> Service-Packs. (discussed some days/weeks ago!)
However, I really don't want, or need, to download anything. Indeed,
the WinTop which I use for CPU Usage indication (among others) I got
from WinMe Kernel Toys. This is a genuine Windows product specifically
for WinMe which does a lot, but not all, of the things that Taskmanager
does in the NT OSs.
So, a Taskmanager substitute for WinMe is unlikely to help me at all.
>
> Maybe there (that) is a better CPU-meter!?
But to know if something is BETTER, I need first of all to know what is
WRONG with the utilities that I already have.
Indeed, this is the sole purpose of my post.
Essentially, is the (generally) low CPU Usage figure indicated by
Process Explorer/WinTop more realistic/believable than the (generally)
much higher CPU Usage number indicated by ACPU/FreeMeter?
TIA
Paul
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Daniel Mandic
>
> P.S.: I think I tried this one:
> http://www.bpa23.host.sk/wupg.html
>
> Here is ME: http://www.mdgx.com/web.htm