freeware

Threads Posts Archives


<< Previous Thread << Previous Post Topic 16013 of 16625
Posts 1 of 29
Next Post >> Next Thread >>

about John Corlis's vote post


de "John Jay Smith" <-> 04/29/2006 02:27



Disclaimer: I pulled my answer out to a new thread because of the request of
the original poster of the Vote post.

My answer to the stupid vote post:

No as a general rule, but yes on seldom, justified occasions.
This newsgroup is about freeware not nagware, however you cannot forbid
someone from talking!

On some exceptional occasions one might want to give information to a
nagware that is not abusive or irritating, as the last alternative other
than spending money or cracking a program.

John Corlis is mad because I told someone about www.995pdf.com
that is not exactly freeware. But I cant really call it nagware either...
Since "nag" is irritating and unpredictable.
I personally have used the pdf printer and I find it a fantastic product,
NOT some stupid nagware, and I dont mind pressing the close button on the
browser.
I mentioned this software because there is no other freeware in this
category for windows.
If it wasnt so good, I wouldnt have said anything.. I have no gain
whatsoever in talking about a program, nor do I have any wish to post in
this group irrelevant content all the time.

So what does he do? He starts a vote now, so he can then say to me, get lost
no one wants your contribution, you are off topic, bla bla bla....

I find this type of childlike action very disturbing... of troll and NetCop
calibre....trying to create a climate of hate...

I do not regularly post anything else than freeware. On the rare occasion
that I think I should mention something else, I do, and I do this to help,
without having any personal gain.

You could call nagware a program that displays a "contribute" button ...
Or a link towards the developers site...
Its not nagware just because it doesnt pop up? Its still in your field of
vision...

I suspect that he is a nice guy, but everyone can get overly enthusiastic
sometimes.





about John Corlis's vote post "John Jay Smith" <->
  Re: about John Corlis's vote post Huss
  Re: about John Corlis's vote post Bill Day
    Re: about John Corlis's vote post Craig
  Re: about John Corlis's vote post John Fitzsimons
  Re: about John Corlis's vote post Jim @ UsableFreeware.com
  OT Re: about John Corlis's vote post Helen
    Re: OT Re: about John Corlis's vote post Craig
    Re: OT Re: about John Corlis's vote post "John Jay Smith" <->
      Re: OT Re: about John Corlis's vote post art2u
  Re: about John Corlis's vote post stop.net.nannies
    Re: about John Corlis's vote post Steve H
      Re: about John Corlis's vote post stop.net.nannies
        Re: about John Corlis's vote post Onno Voors
  Re: about John Corlis's vote post badgolferman
  Re: about John Corlis's vote post BT
  Re: about John Corlis's vote post Maynard Man
    Re: about John Corlis's vote post Andy Mabbett
    Re: about John Corlis's vote post John Corliss
      Re: about John Corlis's vote post Jim @ UsableFreeware.com
      Re: about John Corlis's vote post Maynard Man
        Re: about John Corlis's vote post Daniel Mandic
          Re: about John Corlis's vote post Daniel Mandic
      Re: about John Corlis's vote post Daniel Mandic
      Re: about John Corlis's vote post Peter Seiler
      Re: about John Corlis's vote post hummingbird
        Re: about John Corlis's vote post Daniel Mandic
        Re: about John Corlis's vote post Peter Seiler
    Re: about John Corlis's vote post The Seabat
 
freeware