|
Re: Call for a vote.
de HVS 04/29/2006 02:19
On 29 Apr 2006, Vic Dura wrote
> On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 00:51:17 -0700, John Corliss
><jcorliss@fake.invalid> wrote Re Re: Call for a vote.:
>
>> John Corliss wrote:
>>> Please just answer yes or no. If you feel that discussion is
>>> called for, please start another thread.
>>>
>>> Question: should nagware be considered to be appropriate for
>>> discussion in this group?
>>>
>>
>> I am going to cancel this OP and re-phrase the question more
>> carefully.
>
> IMO A re-phrase would be more helpful if it specifies the
> *degree* of Nag. Some programs have a very unobtrusive and
> benign "nag" that is not annoying in the least, e.g. the old
> Opera Browser. Technically it was Nagware, but it was not an
> objectionable Nag to most people.
Another good example was the nag screen for Polder Backup -- it
appeared very infrequently, and asked for donations to the animal
shelter charity the author supported.
--
Cheers,
Harvey
| Call for a vote. | John Corliss | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | meow2222 | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | Andy Mabbett | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | Maynard Man | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | Roger Johansson | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | John Fitzsimons | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | Caesar Romano | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | Daniel Mandic | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | Doc | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | Daniel Mandic | |
| Re: Call for a vote. **a top post** | Reg Edit | |
| Re: Call for a vote. **a top post** | Maynard Man | |
| Re: Call for a vote. **a top post** | Craig | |
| Re: Call for a vote. **a top post** | Maynard Man | |
| Re: Call for a vote. **a top post** | Craig | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | rmaniacnyc@gmail.com | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | John Corliss | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | Vic Dura | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | John Corliss | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | Art | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | bambam | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | Daniel Mandic | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | Vic Dura | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | Craig | |
| | Re: Call for a vote. | HVS |