Threads Posts Archives

Re: HTML editors

de Kurt 04/29/2006 01:53



"Marv_M" <mfrverdi()someplace.somewhere> wrote in
news:Xns97B43BE714C60mfrverdihotmailcom@66.150.105.47:

>> More accurately, I didn't find it very user friendly.
>
> True in the sense that it does <em>not</em> have a very
> Windows-centric toolbar/menu layout. The learning curve can be
> flattened a bit once you realize the menus are oriented according
> to function rather than the way they would be in a strictly
> windows style.
>

AH ha! So, I'm not quite the total dummy I was thinking I was.


> .
>>
>> Furthermore, rarely did the final output look like anything I
>> composed in it. Not sure why that was -- possibly the different
>> ways non-compliant browsers interprest compliant code?
>
> Probably, I always though Amaya rendered in a rather simplistic
> way. (it never has done frames) I use it more as a quick way to do
> general layout and to check just why things went horribly wrong
> when I misplaced a tag
>:-).

Simple is good. Especially for me.


>>
>> Nor do I remember it incorporating CSS but I haven't looked at it
>> in a long time.
>
> It does css now. In fact it does some (image) things that won't
> even render in most all browsers. I prefer to just use Amaya to
> link to an external file and do the heavy css with Top Style Lite.
> *** Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
> ***
>
>

So, I need some help getting a page to actually show images. Do I need
to make an external link to the image file? If so, can you point me to
a "how-to".
TIA

--
Cheers,
Kurt

HTML editors	Colyn
Re: HTML editors	rmaniacnyc@gmail.com
Re: HTML editors	Salem P
Re: HTML editors	"Marv_M"
Re: HTML editors	Michael Laplante
Re: HTML editors	"Marv_M"
Re: HTML editors	Michael Laplante
Re: HTML editors	"Marv_M"
|          Re: HTML editors	Kurt
Re: HTML editors	"Marv_M"
Re: HTML editors	Kurt
Re: HTML editors	El Gee
Re: HTML editors	Craig
Re: HTML editors	El Gee
Re: HTML editors	nomail

freeware