Re: HTML editors

de "Marv_M" 04/29/2006 11:55

"Michael Laplante" <nowhereman@twilightzone.net> wrote in
news:wSA4g.5313$Cv1.4451@edtnps82:

> "Marv_M" <mfrverdi()someplace.somewhere> wrote in message
> news:Xns97B3D1B576D27mfrverdihotmailcom@66.150.105.47...
>> "Michael Laplante" <nowhereman@twilightzone.net> wrote in
>> news:Hkr4g.2298$Yy5.1772@edtnps89:
>>
>>> Isn't Amaya a wysiwyg editor? (And not a very good one at that.)
>>>
>
>> I consider Amaya better than average for wysiwyg.
>
> More accurately, I didn't find it very user friendly.

True in the sense that it does <em>not</em> have a very Windows-centric
toolbar/menu layout. The learning curve can be flattened a bit once you
realize the menus are oriented according to function rather than the way
they would be in a strictly windows style.

.
>
> Furthermore, rarely did the final output look like anything I composed
> in it. Not sure why that was -- possibly the different ways
> non-compliant browsers interprest compliant code?

Probably, I always though Amaya rendered in a rather simplistic way. (it
never has done frames) I use it more as a quick way to do general layout
and to check just why things went horribly wrong when I misplaced a tag
:-).
>
> Nor do I remember it incorporating CSS but I haven't looked at it in a
> long time.

It does css now. In fact it does some (image) things that won't even
render in most all browsers. I prefer to just use Amaya to link to an
external file and do the heavy css with Top Style Lite.
*** Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com ***

HTML editors	Colyn
Re: HTML editors	rmaniacnyc@gmail.com
Re: HTML editors	Salem P
Re: HTML editors	"Marv_M"
Re: HTML editors	Michael Laplante
Re: HTML editors	"Marv_M"
Re: HTML editors	Michael Laplante
\| Re: HTML editors	"Marv_M"
Re: HTML editors	Kurt
Re: HTML editors	"Marv_M"
Re: HTML editors	Kurt
Re: HTML editors	El Gee
Re: HTML editors	Craig
Re: HTML editors	El Gee
Re: HTML editors	nomail