|
Re: Call for a vote.
de Vic Dura 04/29/2006 12:46
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 00:51:17 -0700, John Corliss
<jcorliss@fake.invalid> wrote Re Re: Call for a vote.:
>John Corliss wrote:
>> Please just answer yes or no. If you feel that discussion is called for,
>> please start another thread.
>>
>> Question: should nagware be considered to be appropriate for discussion
>> in this group?
>>
>
>I am going to cancel this OP and re-phrase the question more carefully.
IMO A re-phrase would be more helpful if it specifies the *degree* of
Nag. Some programs have a very unobtrusive and benign "nag" that is
not annoying in the least, e.g. the old Opera Browser. Technically it
was Nagware, but it was not an objectionable Nag to most people.
--
To email me directly, remove CLUTTER.
| Call for a vote. | John Corliss | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | meow2222 | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | Andy Mabbett | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | Maynard Man | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | Roger Johansson | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | John Fitzsimons | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | Caesar Romano | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | Daniel Mandic | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | Doc | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | Daniel Mandic | |
| Re: Call for a vote. **a top post** | Reg Edit | |
| Re: Call for a vote. **a top post** | Maynard Man | |
| Re: Call for a vote. **a top post** | Craig | |
| Re: Call for a vote. **a top post** | Maynard Man | |
| Re: Call for a vote. **a top post** | Craig | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | rmaniacnyc@gmail.com | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | John Corliss | |
| | Re: Call for a vote. | Vic Dura | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | John Corliss | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | Art | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | bambam | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | Daniel Mandic | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | Vic Dura | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | Craig | |
| Re: Call for a vote. | HVS |