On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 09:21:10 -0800, Beans Baker
<BeansBaker@nowhere.com> wrote:
> I like Roger's definition, as well. This business of trying to define
> "freeware" as a free app that either has no web involvement at all or
> only a certain amount of web involvement but no more than can be
> tolerated by any given individual weighing in on it makes no sense at
> all to me.
I'll support a change to the ware glossary definition along those
lines also, but someone else will have to be the one to put a proposal
together (for obvious reasons.) <g>