On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:39:53 -0600, Ron May <mayron@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 09:34:07 +1100, John Fitzsimons
><DELETEucwubqf02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>> >> Programs are removed from the Pricelessware List. if they do
>> >> not meet the eligibility requirements.
>> < snip >
>> Which is what has happened here. :-)
>I hope you read the "snipped" part.
I do my best to read everything you say Ron. :-)
> As I said, you don't need to
>answer, but I did ask you to reflect on it to understand the piont I'm
>making, even if we can't agree on the end result. ;^)
The point is does an update feature that cannot be turned off, that
could potentially be misused, make something that would otherwise be
freeware non freeware ? IMO Susan has correctly suggested that the
answer is "yes".