|
Re: India is the un-China, says Time
de usenet 06/25/2006 01:50
In article <1151167331.196696.287730@y41g2000cwy.googlegroups.com>,
"mbl*" <mbplee@gmail.com> posted:
> Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
>
> > The people, not some material infrastructure, are the greatest
> > resource of a nation.
> I agree, but they can also be the biggest burden?
I met a person recently who said that she did not like roses
because they have thorns. I know that roses are liked by the
majority of people even they have thorns. A resource is useful
even if some may perceive it as a burden.
Jai Maharaj
http://tinyurl.com/a5ljc
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
> > In article <1151140660.048290.17690@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> > "peeks" <smg.pks@gmail.com> posted:
> >
> > > Well, foreign investment is not coming to India upon a due diligence on
> > > its infrastructure and maderb day facility...it is coming because its
> > > people are growing higher than anywhere else in the world and so is its
> > > people's wealth - more rapidly than anywhere else. so its obvious that
> > > there will be more takers for products here than anywhere else. Did
> > > Unilever not find its way to the remotest Indian village to sell its
> > > soaps and shampoo pouches,, are the MBA clad sales people of Unilever
> > > not servising these territories because they are ill-equipped in terms
> > > of roads, telephonnes and buses....and Unilever has been doing it for
> > > 100 years. The americans and the europeans compromise on everything
> > > when they smell dollar...not like us, nawabs of india
> >
> > > d12s34f56@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:
> > > > > If "India is going down", as you claim, it would be
> > > > > mainly because of corrupt politicians demanding big
> > > > > bribes as they try to play the middleman in outsourcing
> > > > > deals. And the "lack of real talent" claim may become
> > > > > valid after the mediocre graduates as the result of
> > > > > "reservation quotas" (akin to "affirmative action" in the
> > > > > US) hit the job market in a few years.
> > > > >
> > > > > Jai Maharaj
> > > > > http://tinyurl.com/a5ljc
> > > > > http://www.mantra.com/jai
> > > > > Om Shanti
> > > > >
> > > > > In article <beOlg.101096$H71.27860@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>,
> > > > > "Murphy" <xoxoxo@nine.ten> posted:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As usual, time magazine is far behind the curve. India hit its
> climax
> > > last
> > > > > > year and is only going down. Backsourcing of jobs to the U.S. and
> the
> > > lack
> > > > > > of real talent in India are the biggest reasons and it's going to
> put
> > > > > > India's economy in a depression. This also means that Dr Shithead
> Sahib
> > > > > > will have to get a real job scooping shit instead of posting his
> spam
> > > shit
> > > > > > here all day.
> > > > >
> > > > > > "Dr.Sahib.Pandit.Shri.Shri.Rainam Ji Maharaj Ji Ustad"
> > > > > > <praina246898@rediffmail.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:1150789721.972649.132010@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/7598_1724081,00050002.htm
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > A "breathtaking shift" in US policy towards India - declaring it a
> > > > > > > strategic partner and offering it a bilateral deal to share
> nuclear
> > > > > > > know how - can be explained, according to Time magazine, simply by
> one
> > > > > > > phrase: India is the un-China.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Washington's new approach to India is so explained by the American
> > > news
> > > > > > > magazine in its latest issue hitting the news stands on Monday
> with
> > > its
> > > > > > > cover story "INDIA INC - Why the World's Biggest Democracy is the
> Next
> > > > > > > Great Economic Superpower- and What it Means for America."
> > > >
> > > > India's infrastructure is plain awful, you can not expect to continue
> > > > getting foreign investment if the quality of road, power, and
> > > > telecommunications contrasts so sharply with the next door competitor,
> > > > sooner or later, India will hit the bottleneck if only because the bad
> > > > transport system.
>