freeware

Threads Posts Archives


<< Previous Thread << Previous Post Topic 13814 of 16625
Posts 3 of 46
Next Post >> Next Thread >>

Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc.


de charles 06/23/2006 10:25



On 23 Jun 2006 10:47:43 -0700, "Roger Johansson" <roger4911@gmail.com>
wrote:

>There are different ways to handle multitasking but there is no "real
>multitasking" possible as long as you have only one CPU in the
>computer.
>

"real multitasking" is not a technical term

all multitasking strategies/methods are essentially
architectures/processes used by an operating system to share a single
computing resource

http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/m/multitasking.html

there are a lot of technical terms with subtle differences; multitask,
multiprocess, multithread, parallel process, etc.

in any case, in a machine with a modern, hyper-threading multi-core
CPU, all bets are off

and to get back to the original thread: taking advantage of advances
in the underlying CPU and other hardware features is one big reason to
upgrade one's OS

that's why they call it WinTel



Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. Howard Schwartz
  Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. Roger Johansson
|    Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. charles
    Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. Craig
  Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. Roger Johansson
    Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. Craig
    Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. charles
    Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. bambam
    Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. Zepos
  Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. Roger Johansson
  Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. meow2222
  Re: [OT mostly] Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. Mike Dee
    Re: [OT mostly] Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. Sauli Suikkanen
  Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. John Jay Smith
  Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. tbar
  Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. meow2222
    Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. ms
  Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. Sparkle
    Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. Craig
      Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. Ron May
      Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. Sparkle
        Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. Craig
          Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. Sparkle
            [OT] barbs 'n repartee(tm) was: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, Craig
              Re: [OT] barbs 'n repartee(tm) was: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, Sparkle
      Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. arachnid
        Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. Craig
  Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. Craig
    Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. Howard Schwartz
    Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. ms
      Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. Craig
        Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. ms
          Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. Helen
            Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. ms
              Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. ms
        Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. mike
          Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. Craig
            Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. badgolferman
          Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. Duddits
  Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. Roger Johansson
    Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. Ron May
    Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. S.O. Meone
  Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. mike
  Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. beenthere
  Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. badgolferman
    Re: Win98 versus 2000, XP, Longhorn, etc. Thorsten Duhn
 
freeware