> Craig wrote:
>
>
>>>If you have only one CPU (processor) in your computer no "real
>>>multitasking" is possible, there are only different software solutions
>>>available which allow something that looks like multitasking, with
>>>different degrees of success.
>
>
>>As mentioned by Charles, it looks as if you've mistaken multi-threading
>>for multi-tasking. Multi-tasking is a milestone that can be used
>>effectively by 5.x kernels but not DOS.
>
>
> There are different ways to handle multitasking but there is no "real
> multitasking" possible as long as you have only one CPU in the
> computer.
>
OK Roger;
I get it. I should've said "...pre-emptive multitasking, commonly
referred to as 'multitasking.'"