On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 16:27:04 -0400, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
>On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 05:36:09 -0400, Anne Carle <acarle@munge.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Interesting...probably the majority of us who do medical transcription
>>(sci.med.transcription) still use WP 5.1 because of its features and
>>simplicity. It's a dynamite program!
>
>I wonder if you people are still using the MT dictionary developed by
>a gal I knew back in the early 90s.
What program is that? Many of us use Stedman's electronic dictionary
which interfaces with WP 5.1. I believe there are others as well.