|
Re: Which is better - TOP-POSTING OR BOTTOM-POSTING? (Was: Re: Any freeware app to re-format an ntfs...)
de usenet 06/16/2006 04:00
:)
Jai Maharaj
http://tinyurl.com/a5ljc
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
In article <ccikg.240649$5Z.139006@dukeread02>,
"harmony" <aka@hotmail.com> posted:
> it's cloudy most of time of the year in britain. when the sun does come out
> brits come out in hoards, shouting "raaaaaaa......j".
>
>
> www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj) posted:
>
> > The Sun has set for the Brit barbarians <spit>.
> >
> > Jai Maharaj
> > http://tinyurl.com/a5ljc
> > http://www.mantra.com/jai
> > Om Shanti
> >
> > In article <vXWjg.231950$5Z.210800@dukeread02>,
> > "harmony" <aka@hotmail.com> posted:
> >> i would agree with that. freshness must be at the top. chronology of
> >> events
> >> always runs top to bottom, most recent being at the top. british messed
> >> it
> >> up with their bottom posting. is it any wonder brits drive on the wrong
> >> side
> >> of the street, and have 50cycle high voltage electricity?
> >>
> >>
> >> www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj) posted:
> >>
> >> > This issue comes up often in most newsgroups. Top-posting
> >> > is definitely better in certain situations.
> >> >
> >> > Jai Maharaj
> >> > http://tinyurl.com/a5ljc
> >> > http://www.mantra.com/jai
> >> > Om Shanti
> >> >
> >> > In alt.comp.freeware, in article
> >> > <MrQ97E2EA4F7CE2itsmeitsQ@QsFQDN.dyndns.org>,
> >> > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=BBQ=AB?= <boxcars@gmx.net> posted:
> >> >>
> >> >> But it's not possible to change someone else's post, except locally.
> >> >> No matter what's done in followups, the OP remains as it was.
> >> >
> >> >> Uncle Sam <> wrote in
> >> >> <news:smeu82pma8i6eq3v3ikrolv9vfh5sb9j5r@4ax.com>:
> >> >>
> >> >> > My issue is not with top or bottom (or interleaved) posting - its
> >> >> > with the arrogance of someone who would actually change someone
> >> >> > elses post to fit their prefernces. That is "imposing" yourself.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>