Vrodok the Piglet lover <Pay.Troll@70.cents.pls> wrote in
<news:5fa042ds6dajde2varm5nrp67u1pkm59q2@4ax.com>:
> Once Upon A Time (on Fri, 14 Apr 2006 17:56:12 -0500), in
> alt.comp.freeware,
> »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net>, by way of Message-id
> <MrQ97A5B67675915itsmeitsQ@QsFQDN.dyndns.org>, wrote:
>
>> Vrodok the Piglet lover <Pay.Troll@70.cents.pls> wrote in
>> <news:ujst32pmlsimh35avus0gor9sdj8ifv70c@4ax.com>:
>>
>>> Now, yes. Not, however, when I first began bleating & squealing.
>>
>> No. The OP in this thread pointed to mozilla.org, not "various &
>> sundry sites", and what was going on the entire time was the
>> release of a new version of Firefox.
>>
>>> One should realize that, in 5 minutes or less, certain things
>>> (such as the Official website) may change _completely_.
>>
>> Perhaps one should wait a while before starting the bleating &
>> squealing.
>
> You are equal with "Jondy", when it comes to thick-headedness.
No idea what you're talking about.
> Someone came in(to) here, saying 1.5.0.2 had been released, and
> showing an apparently valid url (albeit of the http/ftp variety).
A valid http URL for the Firefox 1.5.0.2 release directory, yes.
> So, to confirm same, I browsed over within Mozilla.com (base, and
> the particular Firefox page), & checked the link, to
> Newest-version. Nope; 1.5.0.1. Browsed over to Majorgeeks.com;
> same thing (advert for 1.5.0.2, but actually serving 1.5.0.1).
> Checked back (and refreshed) Mozilla.com; nothing new. Checked
> Filehippo.com; 1.5.0.1.
Checking third party sites is a waste of your time if your concern is
to determine whether or not the Mozilla folks are releasing a new
version.
> And so the checking went, on & on & on,
I've got no problem with your checking on & on & on, just with your
premature bleating. I've suggested you wait longer before bleating, so
that I (or someone else) doesn't need to correct the misinformation you
post; it would be great if you'd consider the suggestion rather than
just label me thickheaded.